Enterprise Architecture Assessment
Evaluates how effectively enterprise architecture aligns business strategy, capabilities, applications, data, integrations, technology, security, standards, governance, and transformation execution.
EASC PrismIQ — a growing portfolio of enterprise maturity assessments
EASC PrismIQ helps organizations understand current-state maturity, establish target-state maturity, identify capability gaps, prioritize improvement opportunities, and create transformation roadmaps. Every assessment uses the same 1–5 maturity model and produces current-versus-target comparisons, radar charts, gap analysis, maturity levels, and executive-friendly findings.
Current-State Maturity
Score capabilities on a consistent 1–5 model with evidence notes.
Target-State Definition
Set an editable target per discipline and quantify the distance.
Gap & Priority Analysis
Critical, High, Medium, and Low priorities derived from gap size.
Transformation Roadmap
Deterministic focus initiatives ordered by impact.
Methodology
Shared scoring model
Every score across EASC PrismIQ is calculated deterministically from your responses.
Capability scale (1–5)
1
Not Supported
Capability does not exist, is unknown, or is entirely ad hoc.
2
Partially Supported
Some activities occur, but they are inconsistent, informal, or dependent on individuals.
3
Defined
Processes, standards, ownership, and tools are documented and used in meaningful portions of the organization.
4
Managed
Capability is consistently implemented, measured, governed, and integrated across the organization.
5
Fully Supported
Capability is enterprise-wide, measured, optimized/automated where appropriate, continuously improved, and demonstrably supports business value.
Maturity bands
| Score range | Level | Label |
|---|---|---|
| 1.00 – 1.49 | Level 1 | Not Supported |
| 1.50 – 2.49 | Level 2 | Developing |
| 2.50 – 3.49 | Level 3 | Defined |
| 3.50 – 4.49 | Level 4 | Managed |
| 4.50 – 5.00 | Level 5 | Optimized |
Calculations
- Discipline current score = average of answered questions in that discipline.
- Overall maturity = average of the discipline current scores.
- Target score defaults to 4.00 per discipline and is editable from 1.00 to 5.00.
- Gap = target − current.
- Completion = answered questions ÷ 50.
Priority thresholds
- Critical — gap ≥ 1.50
- High — gap ≥ 1.00
- Medium — gap ≥ 0.50
- Low — gap < 0.50
Assessment runs are stored privately against your account so you can resume work, duplicate a baseline, and compare re-assessments over time. Scores are calculated deterministically from your responses.
Available assessments
Choose a diagnostic
One account, one login, and a shared scoring model across every assessment in the platform.
Available
Data Strategy Assessment
Evaluates Data Strategy capability maturity across vision and alignment, business value, operating model, data domains and products, architecture, governance and trust, analytics and AI, literacy and culture, investment, and roadmap execution.
Cybersecurity Assessment
Evaluate cybersecurity capability maturity across ten disciplines spanning governance, risk, protection, detection, response, and resilience. Informed by the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 functions; not a formal NIST compliance audit.
PrismIQ includes 11 enterprise maturity assessments in the full library.
See Them AllMore assessments coming
EASC PrismIQ is an extensible assessment platform. Additional diagnostics plug into the same scoring model, library, and executive reporting. Want to add a diagnostic? Send a request. If we use it, you earn 2 credits.